15 May 2023, 16:15-18:00
Event
Sumanley xulx /Pixabay
Torture is absolutely prohibited. However, there are currently no global regulations regulating trade in the ‘tools of torture’. ‘Tools of torture’ comprise inherently abusive equipment such as body-worn electric shock devices, weighted leg irons and spiked batons that can only be used for torture or ill-treatment; and equipment such as police batons, rubber bullets and pepper spray — that can be readily misused for such purposes.
To fill this regulatory gap, the EU, Argentina, and Mongolia initiated the Alliance for Torture-Free Trade in 2017. The alliance gathered to create an international instrument that builds upon existing regional measures such as the EU’s Anti-Torture Regulation (Regulation 2019/125), first adopted in 2005 and amended in 2019. The ongoing work of this alliance has led to the adoption of UNGA Resolution (73/304) (2019), which resulted in a report from the UN Secretary-General (74/969) (2020), and a report by the UN Group of Governmental Experts (76/850) (2022). The UN General Assembly reiterated its commitment to addressing this governance gap with Resolution (77/209) (2022).
To showcase these efforts, the Geneva Academy and the Geneva Graduate Institute are co-conveying a high-level public panel with key experts in the field of torture. The roundtable will explain the genesis of the abovementioned regulatory initiatives, what it took to achieve them, and shed light on the road ahead.
How might an international trade regulation help advance anti-torture initiatives? To address this question, this high-level public roundtable will firstly situate a range of UN initiatives that aim to regulate the trade in ‘tools of torture’. Secondly, it will introduce the main findings and policy recommendations of the UN Group of Governmental Experts, as articulated in their 2022 report. Bringing together the insights of experts from a range of institutions involved or with a stake in this regulatory process, this roundtable will also address next steps. Panelists will notably be asked to reflect on how to generate enough critical will and momentum in order to advance a legally binding global treaty regulating the trade in ‘tools of torture’. Given the recent call for input (28 April 2023) by Alice Edwards, the UN Special Rapporteur on Torture, this event is extremely timely and hopes to provide a fruitful space for multistakeholder dialogue and exchange.
The event will be followed by a reception.
Geneva Academy
Mô Bleeker, UNSG Special Adviser on the Responsibility to Protect, shares how her work as Senior Fellow at the Geneva Academy contributes to our shared goals.
Adobe
Our recent research brief, Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology, examines how effectively GDPR addresses the unique risks posed by neurodata.
Adobe Stock
This seminar explores how national mechanisms for implementation, reporting and follow-up can better integrate the capacities, data, and experiences of local and regional governments in advancing human rights implementation and reporting.
Adobe Stock
The event, as part of the AI for Good Summit 2025 will explore how AI tools can support faster data analysis, help uncover patterns in large datasets, and expand the reach of human rights work.
Adobe
This training course, specifically designed for staff of city and regional governments, will explore the means and mechanisms through which local and regional governments can interact with and integrate the recommendations of international human rights bodies in their concrete work at the local level.
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
The Geneva Human Rights Platform contributes to this review process by providing expert input via different avenues, by facilitating dialogue on the review among various stakeholders, as well as by accompanying the development of a follow-up resolution to 68/268 in New York and in Geneva.
Geneva Academy
Geneva Academy