New Publication Examines the Effects of Private Military and Security Companies

12 March 2025

Private Military and Security Companies (PMSCs) have long operated on the edges of conflict, providing everything from combat support to site protection and logistical services. However, a small subset — which this research calls the '1%' — has evolved into something more complex on the border of private enterprise, state-backed militias, and mercenaries.

Our latest research brief, The 1%: Doing Business With Proxy Military Companies, authored by Associate Researcher Robin van der Lugt, examines how these entities — termed 'proxy military companies' — have reshaped warfare, international law, and global stability. Unlike conventional PMSCs, these groups are not independent security contractors operating in competitive markets. Instead, they function as extensions of state power, conducting combat operations, hybrid warfare, and resource exploitation on behalf of authoritarian regimes.

The report highlights key actors in this space, including Russia’s now-rebranded Wagner Group, Türkiye’s SADAT, and UAE-backed combat surrogates. These entities operate with near-total impunity, exploiting legal loopholes and plausible deniability to evade accountability. The report asserts that their emergence represents more than just an evolution of private military forces; it signals a return to Cold War-style proxy warfare, where states outsource violence while avoiding direct responsibility. 

One risk, explains Erica Harper, Head of Research and Policy Studies at the Geneva Academy, is a lowering of the entry barriers to conflict. 'Part of the attractiveness of PMCs is that they can break rules that States can’t or shouldn’t. A rule free zone that is beyond the reach of international accountability interrupts the system’s ability to uphold peace and security. Left too long, this may spill over into a new normal around inter-State conduct at a time when the system lacks the robustness to self correct.'

Robin van der Lugt explains, 'Existing regulatory frameworks, such as the Montreux Document and the International Code of Conduct (ICoC), were designed to bring oversight to PMSCs operating in commercial markets. However, these guidelines fail to address state-sponsored entities whose actions are driven by geopolitical strategy rather than market forces. The result is a system ill-equipped to regulate modern PMSCs that act as covert arms of state policy rather than independent contractors.'

The paper argues for a critical reclassification of these entities, explaining that terms such as 'private military company' fail to capture their true nature, obscuring their direct ties to state interests. Instead, recognizing them as proxy military companies or contractual proxies more accurately reflects their role in contemporary conflicts and underscores the urgent need for new accountability mechanisms.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

MENA Training GHRP News

Strengthening MENA Engagement with UN Human Rights Mechanisms: Second Edition of our Tailored Training

24 July 2025

Participants from six countries across the Middle East and North Africa region joined our customized training on the Geneva-based United Nations human rights mechanisms

Read more

bombed building News

Expert Consultation on CESCR’s General Comment on ICESCR in Armed Conflict

8 May 2025

The Geneva Academy convened an expert consultation on the CESCR’s General Comment on the Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Situations of Armed Conflict.

Read more

Special Rapporteur Sign Event

Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in an Era of Escalating Armed Conflict: Where Can International Human Rights Law Help?

25 September 2025, 18:30-20:00

This evening dialogue will present the publication: International Human Rights Law: A Treatise, Cambridge University Press (2025).

Read more

A general view of participants during of the 33nd ordinary session of the Human Rights Council. Training

The Universal Periodic Review and the UN Human Rights System: Raising the Bar on Accountability

10-14 November 2025

This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.

Read more

Town Hall Meeting Training

Localizing International Human Rights

8-10 October 2025

This training course, specifically designed for staff of city and regional governments, will explore the means and mechanisms through which local and regional governments can interact with and integrate the recommendations of international human rights bodies in their concrete work at the local level.

Read more

Neutrotechology Project

Neurotechnology and Human Rights

Started in August 2023

This project addresses the human rights implications stemming from the development of neurotechnology for commercial, non-therapeutic ends, and is based on a partnership between the Geneva Academy, the Geneva University Neurocentre and the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. 

Read more

Session of the UN Human Rights Committee Project

Treaty Body Review 2020 and Beyond

Started in January 2018

The Geneva Human Rights Platform contributes to this review process by providing expert input via different avenues, by facilitating dialogue on the review among various stakeholders, as well as by accompanying the development of a follow-up resolution to 68/268 in New York and in Geneva.

Read more

Cover of the 2023 Geneva Academy Annual Report Publication

Annual Report 2024

published on July 2025

Read more