We use various third-party cookies to provide social media features and to analyze our traffic. Please use the options below to manage your cookie settings. You can change your cookie settings at any time. Please be aware, if you deny cookies, certain features of our website may not work.
This will apply to all services
Google Analytics
YouTube
Adobe>
21 January 2025
Advances in neurotechnology (NT) have driven the growing collection and processing of neurodata – data related to the structure and functioning of the human brain – across various societal domains. The development and use of NTs heavily depend on neurodata to ensure device functionality (e.g., neurofeedback monitors or brain-computer interfaces) and to enhance performance by refining AI algorithms integrated into these devices.
In our new Research Brief, ‘Neurodata: Navigating GDPR and AI Act Compliance in the Context of Neurotechnology’, Timo Istace highlights the delicate balance needed between leveraging neurodata for progress and protecting individual rights. He notes that ‘the indispensability of neurodata to fuelling progress in the sector needs to be balanced against the risks to individual users. Neurodata is a highly sensitive and personal form of data, akin to genetic data. Its combined features – including its informational richness (extending to cognitive processes), predictive potential, and risk of involuntary disclosure – warrant significant scrutiny to preserve individuals’ privacy, particularly mental privacy.’
Timo further explains, ‘Data protection regulations are crucial in addressing these concerns. The sensitive nature of neurodata raises questions around whether current regulatory frameworks offer adequate protection against incursions on mental privacy and the safeguarding of neurodata. While no supranational regulation specifically addresses neurodata, regional instruments like the EU’s General Data Protection Regulation (2018) provide a framework for assessing protection measures.’
This paper evaluates the effectiveness of the GDPR in mitigating risks associated with the distinctive nature of neurodata, with the goal of safeguarding neuroprivacy and mental privacy in the context of emerging NTs. It analyzes the scope and applicability of the GDPR, examines the challenges of ensuring robust protection during the collection, processing, storage, and transfer of neurodata, and considers how the recent EU AI Act might complement or reinforce GDPR safeguards.
News
ITU
Our event brought together human rights practitioners, data scientists, and AI experts to explore how artificial intelligence can support efforts to monitor human rights and the Sustainable Development Goals.
News
Geneva Academy
Sixteen diplomats from fifteen Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries participated in a two-day Practical Training on Human Rights Council Procedures.
Training
UN Photo / Jean-Marc Ferré
This training course will explore the origin and evolution of the Universal Periodic Review (UPR) and its functioning in Geneva and will focus on the nature of implementation of the UPR recommendations at the national level.
Project
The Geneva Human Rights Platform contributes to this review process by providing expert input via different avenues, by facilitating dialogue on the review among various stakeholders, as well as by accompanying the development of a follow-up resolution to 68/268 in New York and in Geneva.
Project
Olivier Chamard / Geneva Academy
The Treaty Body Members’ Platform connects experts in UN treaty bodies with each other as well as with Geneva-based practitioners, academics and diplomats to share expertise, exchange views on topical questions and develop synergies.
Publication
