Counterterrorism in Europe: Ambiguous Security Gains for Significant Impacts on Rights

26 September 2023

The relentless expansion of counterterrorism policies has significantly affected human rights. However, the effectiveness of these measures remains shrouded in uncertainty, with their designs often lacking empirical foundations and their functioning rarely subjected to rigorous evaluation. At the same time, the debate on the justifiability of rights' limitations in the name of national security has not adequately considered the effectiveness of counterterrorism efforts.

Our newly released Working Paper bridges the gap between the notion of ‘effectiveness’ in counterterrorism and human rights law to stimulate discussion among the academic, human rights, and policy-making communities. It offers a comprehensive examination of counterterrorism measures implemented across Europe and delves into the formidable challenges faced when attempting to assess the effectiveness of counterterrorism initiatives. Additionally, the paper conducts a thorough review of existing studies that endeavour to gauge the impact of these measures and identifies persisting gaps in the scholarly literature. It explores areas hitherto underexplored, such as the often-overlooked psychological effects of counterterrorism policies and the imperative for adopting a multifaceted approach to measuring effectiveness.

‘In a world grappling with complex security challenges, ‘Exploring Counterterrorism Effectiveness and Human Rights Law’ invites readers to embark on a critical journey, shedding light on the intricate dynamics between security and human rights. It calls for us to consider the effectiveness of counterterrorism policies as a matter of human rights law and demonstrates the benefits of this approach in improving the rationality of the decision-making process’ explains our Director Professor Gloria Gaggioli, co-author of the paper and principal investigator of the Research Project Counter-Terror Pro LegEm.

The ‘Proportionality Test’ and the European Court of Human Rights’ Approach

Within the realm of human rights law, a pivotal question examined in this paper revolves around the role of counterterrorism measures' effectiveness in justifying the restriction of certain 'limitable' rights. Central to this analysis is the 'proportionality test,' a doctrinal construct encompassing a series of sequential inquiries aimed at evaluating the justifiability of limiting rights.

The paper sheds light on the advantages of scrutinizing the subtest of 'suitability' or 'rational connection' in the context of assessing the effectiveness of national security measures. By doing so, it explores the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, revealing how claims of effectiveness influence the Court’s legal reasoning.
‘While exploring the nuanced stance adopted by the Court regarding the relevance of effectiveness in its practice, our paper underscores the limitations of the Court’s approach to the proportionality test’ underlinesIlya Sobol, co-author of the paper and PhD Candidate at the University of Geneva Law Faculty.

The paper's concluding section navigates the intricate interplay between judicial review and the constraints of judicial deference when engaging with counterterrorism effectiveness. It posits that judicial review alone cannot surmount the existing barriers in counterterrorism evaluation. To enhance the ability of the judiciary to effectively assess counterterrorism measures, a collaborative effort involving various stakeholders is crucial.

Measures to Integrate Effectiveness in Counterterrorism Review

The paper culminates by outlining essential forms of stakeholder engagement and proposing steps to enhance non-judicial counterterrorism review. These measures encompass improvements in collecting and disclosing basic descriptive statistical information, elucidating the models informing counterterrorism decision-making, and heightened empirical rigour in research evaluating the human rights impacts of counterterrorism measures.

‘There remains to be plenty of ‘low-hanging fruit’ in the world of counterterrorism review – measures that can significantly improve our understanding of such policies’ effects at little to no cost to the process. These improvements may yield meaningful benefits to counterterrorism policy-making, bringing us closer to a better understanding of both the security gains they produce and the human rights costs they impose’ stresses Dr Michael Moncrieff, co-author of the paper and Postdoctoral Researcher in Social Sciences at the University of Geneva Law Faculty.

Part of the Research Project ‘Counter-Terror Pro LegEm’

This paper forms part of the research project ‘Counter-Terror Pro LegEm’ led by our Director Professor Gloria Gaggioli. The project – funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation, hosted by the University of Geneva and conducted in partnership with the Geneva Academy – examines the effectiveness of counterterrorism measures and their effects on human rights and analyses the structure of terrorist networks such as Al Qaeda or the Islamic State to see whether they qualify as ‘organized armed groups’ for the purpose of international humanitarian law.

MORE ON THIS THEMATIC AREA

News

New Working Paper Explores AI for Human Rights and SDG Monitoring

30 January 2025

A new working paper, 'AI Decoded: Key Concepts and Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Human Rights and SDG Monitoring', has been published by the Geneva Human Rights Platform.

Read more

bombed building News

Expert Consultation on CESCR’s General Comment on ICESCR in Armed Conflict

8 May 2025

The Geneva Academy convened an expert consultation on the CESCR’s General Comment on the Application of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights in Situations of Armed Conflict.

Read more

Event

Strengths and Challenges of Inter-State Applications Before the European Court of Human Rights

22 May 2025, 18:30-20:00

In this Geneva Academy Talk Judge Lətif Hüseynov will discuss the challenges of inter-State cases under the ECHR, especially amid rising conflict-related applications.

Read more

Training

Human Rights and the Environment: Introducing Legal Regimes and Key Issues

1-8 September 2025

Participants in this training course will be introduced to the major international and regional instruments for the promotion of human rights, as well as international environmental law and its implementation and enforcement mechanisms.

Read more

A general view of participants during of the 33nd ordinary session of the Human Rights Council. Training

Practical Training on Human Rights Council Procedures for SIDS/LDCs

4-5 June 2025

This hands-on training is designed specifically for diplomats from Small Island Developing States and Least Developed Countries who are current or prospective members of the United Nations Human Rights Council.

Read more

Neutrotechology Project

Neurotechnology and Human Rights

Started in August 2023

This project addresses the human rights implications stemming from the development of neurotechnology for commercial, non-therapeutic ends, and is based on a partnership between the Geneva Academy, the Geneva University Neurocentre and the UN Human Rights Council Advisory Committee. 

Read more

surveillance image of people Project

Human Rights in a Digitalized World: Mapping Risk, Strengthening Regulation and Promoting the Development of International Human Rights Law

Started in August 2023

To unpack the challenges raised by artificial intelligence, this project will target two emerging and under-researched areas: digital military technologies and neurotechnology.

Read more

Cover Page of Research Brief Publication

War on Minorities’ Under the Guise of Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism

published on December 2024

Beatrice Meretti

Read more

Cover Page of Research Brief Publication

Navigating Pathways Toward Transitional Justice in Ukraine

published on October 2024

Robin van der Lugt, Chhime Namdol Sherpa

Read more