Three new Working Papers – researched by the Geneva Academy in the context of our research on disruptive military technologies – address some of the main issues of contention concerning the application of international law to military cyber operations. They focus on the rules of international humanitarian law (IHL) but also take into account other pertinent legal frameworks, most importantly international human rights law.
‘New (military) technologies have a profound impact on how wars are fought. While IHL is applicable to all technological developments in warfare, the speed, scale, and transformative impact of today’s technological advances require a constant (re-)assessment whether new means and methods of warfare are compatible with existing IHL rules’ explains Professor Gloria Gaggioli, Director of the Geneva Academy.
The three Working Papers attempt to lay the groundwork for further research. Based on brief scenarios, they identify the applicable law, as well as parts of the law that either exhibit gaps or are in need of clarification in view of the novel possibilities of conduct in or through cyberspace.
‘By showing some of the potential ramifications of the use of cyber technologies in contemporary conflicts, these papers aim at facilitating an informed debate about the future of international law in this area. Given their foundational focus, they will be of interest to scholars of international legal studies and international relations as well as to policymakers, journalists, and researchers at NGOs’ underlines Gloria Gaggioli.
The first paper Protecting Societies: Anchoring a New Protection Dimension in International Law in Times of Increased Cyber Threats takes a broader perspective on IHL in view of the possibilities of military cyber technologies to disrupt the fundamental functions of modern societies, with potentially severe ramifications for the continuity of civilian life during conflicts.
’Current IHL, with its focus on the physical effects of armed conflicts, seems ill-suited to sufficiently regulate military cyber conduct. In light of this, the paper proposes the recognition of an entirely new protection dimension for the law of armed conflict that adequately protects interconnected and digitalized civilian societies against the consequences of twenty-first century warfare. It argues that certain societal processes across economic, financial, scientific, cultural, and healthcare domains must be considered so essential as to require protection under IHL irrespective of physical aspects’ explains Henning Lahmann, Associate Research Fellow at the Geneva Academy.
Markus Spiske on Unsplash
The second paper Protecting the Global Information Space in Times of Armed Conflict focuses on the legal implications of digital information warfare in the context of the laws of armed conflict. Based on a number of fictional scenarios, it inquires whether and what legal limits exist in relation to digital information operations during armed conflict and whether the framework of IHL adequately captures the humanitarian protection needs that arise from these types of military conduct.
’This paper concludes that while there are a number of rules that apply, they fail to address the specificities of the malicious use of information in armed conflict. Acknowledging the limits of existing law, it suggests furthering the debate by focusing on potential non-physical, systemic adversarial effects of military information operations that so far fall through the cracks of IHL. The potential impact on civilian populations warrants a fundamental reconsideration’ says Henning Lahmann.
Building on existing legal discussions concerning the status of ’data’ in the law of armed conflict, the third paper Protection of Data in Armed Conflict attempts to refocus the debate by clarifying the different ways the notion of ’data’ can be conceived, and how these differences require nuanced legal approaches. On that basis, the paper presents a novel way to conceptualise the protection of ’data’ in armed conflict.
’In light of persisting ambiguities of existing law, the targeting of content data continues to fall into a legal grey zone, with potentially wide-ranging ramifications both for the rights of individuals and the functioning of civilian societies. Therefore, a paradigm shift is proposed: instead of taking existing rules of IHL and applying them to ’data’, we should contemplate applying the principles of data protection, data security, and privacy frameworks to military cyber operations in armed conflict’ underlines Henning Lahmann.
Professor Marco Sassòli has been appointed as one of three experts on a mission to investigate violations of international humanitarian law and international human rights law in Ukraine for the OSCE.
Olivier Chamard/Geneva Academy
Professor Sassòli was in charge of the IHL part of the report that was presented on 13 April by the three experts to the OSCE Permanent Council.
UN Photo/Manuel Elias
This short course, which can be followed in Geneva or online, provides an introduction to the regime of sanctions under international law and their effectiveness in addressing contemporary forms of conflict. It addresses the questions related to state responsibility, the pacific settlement of international disputes and the role of the International Court of Justice.
This short course examines the sources of international humanitarian law and provides an introduction to its key principles and terminology.
Medical Aid for Palestinians / Ezz Al Zanoon
This project aimed to ensure better protection of and assistance for persons with disabilities in situations of armed conflict or its aftermath by identifying legal obligations to protect and assist persons with disabilities during conflict, and the policies and practices required to put these obligations into effect.
This project examined how IHL could be more systematically, appropriately and correctly dealt with by the human rights mechanisms emanating from the UN Charter, as well as from universal and regional treaties.